Over the past few months, I have written about why your work does not speak for itself, why sponsorship matters more than mentorship, and why generosity often precedes power rather than following it. On the surface, they seem like different topics yet, in reality, they have all been attempts to answer the same question.
How do careers actually advance?
It is a question that has occupied me for years.
When I look back over my own career, I can see progression that makes perfect sense in hindsight, which can be explained through cause and effect. I worked hard, learnt quickly, took on responsibility and progressed.
But I can also see career inflection points that do not fit that explanation at all. There were opportunities I could never have planned for, people who quietly advocated for me in rooms I was not in, and decisions that worked in my favour long before I understood they were being made.
There were also times when I did everything I believed should matter and found that nothing seemed to move my way. There were times when very unexpected things I had done for others came back in a good way to advance my career.
Most of us inherit a single explanation at the beginning of our careers. Work hard, do good work, and it will speak for itself. Those experiences convinced me that this is only part of the story. It explains performance. It does not fully explain advancement.
Since the beginning of this year, I have immersed myself in research on sponsorship, organisational behaviour, political skill, networks, influence, reputation and career progression. I was not looking for a new philosophy. I was looking for language, research, evidence and frameworks that could explain patterns I had experienced, observed and reflected on throughout my career and my clients' careers.
What I found was remarkably consistent.
The research gave names to ideas I had struggled to articulate. It clarified the distinction between mentors and sponsors. It explained why some networks create opportunity while others simply create connection. It showed why advocacy changes careers, why reputation travels independently of performance, and why influence is built long before it is needed.
More importantly, it confirmed something I had long believed.
Every organisation runs on two systems.
There is the formal system that appears on the organisation chart. It includes reporting lines, objectives, performance reviews and clearly defined responsibilities. It is the system we are taught to navigate from the very beginning of our careers.
Alongside it is another system. Less visible, but no less real. It is where trust is built, reputations spread, advocacy happens, alliances form and opportunities emerge.
Most of us spend decades becoming fluent in the first system. Very few of us are ever taught to understand the second.
That second system is what I call political literacy.
This is not politics in the cynical sense. Nor is it manipulation or political games. Political literacy is the ability to understand how decisions, influence and opportunity actually move through an organisation, so that you can participate in that system with integrity rather than being surprised by it.
This is also the foundation of my executive coaching.
Over the years, I have noticed that I attract a particular kind of client. They are thoughtful, empathetic and highly competent. They care deeply about the quality of their work and the people around them. They are generous with their time, committed to doing the right thing and rarely interested in climbing over others to get ahead.
Those qualities are strengths. But they can also become blind spots.
Many of my clients carry more than their share. They over-function. They avoid self-promotion because it seems inauthentic. They assume that if they continue producing excellent work, someone will eventually notice.
Sometimes that happens. Often it does not.
By the time they come to coaching, capability is rarely the issue. They do not need another course on leadership, executive presence or communication. What they are missing is a clearer understanding of the system in which their capability is being recognised, interpreted and advocated for.
My work is not about helping good people become political. It is about helping highly capable and competent people become politically literate.
If you want to know where you stand, the political literacy assessment measures five dimensions in about ten minutes.
Because once you understand how organisations actually work, you no longer have to choose between your integrity and your ambition. You can build strong relationships without becoming transactional. You can increase your visibility without becoming performative. You can cultivate sponsors without manipulating people. And you can contribute generously while also ensuring your work has the influence it deserves. You can get through challenging situations without losing your sleep or catastrophising.
Why I wrote How Careers Actually Advance
It is not just another article in this series. It is the foundation beneath all the others. The guides on sponsorship, strategic networks, advocacy, alliances and influence all build on the same underlying idea: careers advance through more than competence alone.
Performance determines what there is to recognise. Everything else determines whether it is recognised, by whom, and in time to matter.
If you have been reading Fluent for a while, I hope this guide brings the threads together. If you are new here, I think it is the best place to begin.
As always, I would love to hear what resonates, what challenges your thinking, and what questions it raises. Much of this work has been shaped by conversations with readers, and I hope that continues.
Frequently asked questions
Why doesn't good work speak for itself?
Good work demonstrates competence, but advancement requires more than competence. Decisions about promotions, opportunities and career-defining assignments happen through advocacy, reputation and relationships, often in rooms you are not in. Performance determines what there is to recognise. The informal system determines whether it is recognised.
What is the difference between political literacy and playing politics?
Playing politics implies manipulation and self-serving behaviour. Political literacy is the ability to understand how decisions, influence and opportunity actually move through an organisation. It allows you to participate with integrity rather than being blindsided by dynamics you did not see coming.
How do I advance my career without compromising my values?
Political literacy does not require you to become someone you are not. Once you understand the informal system, you can build genuine relationships, increase your visibility authentically, cultivate sponsors through trust rather than manipulation, and ensure your contributions have the influence they deserve, all without sacrificing integrity.